Admissibility of entries in the books of account

 

The Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (Indian Evidence Act 2023) Section 28 deals with the admissibility of entries in the books of account as evidence in legal proceedings. According to this section, entries in the books of account, whether they are in physical or electronic form, are not sufficient evidence on their own to charge any person with liability.

In simpler terms, just because something is written or recorded in a company's financial records doesn't automatically make it true or legally binding. The law recognizes that there can be inaccuracies, manipulations, or errors in accounting entries, and relying solely on these entries may not provide a complete picture or establish liability.

Therefore, if a court is inquiring into a matter and relies solely on the entries in the books of account as evidence, Section 28 stipulates that such entries are not enough. The court will need additional evidence to substantiate any claims or charges against a person. This ensures that a more thorough investigation is conducted and that judgments are based on a broader range of evidence, not just accounting records.

Other types of evidence that may be required could include witness testimonies, documents, contracts, invoices, bank statements, or expert opinions, depending on the specifics of the case. These additional sources of evidence help corroborate or challenge the information provided in the books of account, providing a more comprehensive understanding for the court to make a fair and informed decision.

Top of Form

 

Penalties and Fines under Companies Act 2013

 

Under the Companies Act 2013, there are provisions for penalties and fines for various non-compliances and violations. These penalties aim to ensure that companies adhere to the prescribed rules and regulations, maintaining transparency and accountability in their operations. Here are some instances where penalties and fines may be imposed:

1.    Late Filing: If a company fails to submit its financial statements, annual returns, or other required documents within the specified timeframes, penalties can be levied. The amount of the penalty may vary based on the duration of the delay.

2.    Non-compliance with AGM: As in the case mentioned earlier, if a company fails to hold its Annual General Meeting (AGM) within the mandated timeframe, there can be penalties imposed by the Registrar of Companies.

3.    Violation of Corporate Governance Norms: Companies are expected to adhere to corporate governance norms, failure of which can result in penalties. This includes issues like non-appointment of required directors, non-maintenance of statutory registers, etc.

4.    Mismanagement or Misrepresentation: If there is evidence of mismanagement, misleading financial statements, or misrepresentation of facts by the company, penalties may be imposed on the directors or officers responsible.

5.    Non-compliance with Specific Sections: The Companies Act has various sections covering different aspects of corporate functioning. Non-compliance with any of these sections could attract penalties or fines depending on the nature and severity of the violation.

The Registrar of Companies (RoC) is generally responsible for overseeing compliance with these regulations. The fines and penalties can vary in amount and severity, sometimes escalating if the non-compliance persists or if it's a repeated offense.

It's essential for companies to be aware of these provisions and ensure strict adherence to the regulations to avoid facing penalties and fines that can impact their financial health and reputation. Compliance not only avoids legal issues but also ensures trust among stakeholders and investors in the company's operations.

Top of Form

 

Adjudications proceedings under Companies Act, 2013

 

Adjudication proceedings under the Companies Act 2013 involve a legal process initiated by regulatory authorities (like the Registrar of Companies or National Company Law Tribunal) to address non-compliance or violations by a company or its officers. Here's a breakdown:

1.    Nature of Proceedings: Adjudication proceedings are quasi-judicial in nature, meaning they involve a process similar to a court trial but are conducted by administrative or regulatory bodies empowered under the law.

2.    Purpose: The primary aim is to address alleged breaches of the Companies Act provisions, regulations, or directives. These breaches can encompass various aspects, including non-filing or delayed filing of statutory documents, violations related to corporate governance, mismanagement, fraud, or any other non-compliance stipulated under the Act.

3.    Initiation: The proceedings typically commence when the regulatory authority, upon inspection or based on complaints or reports, identifies potential violations by a company or its officers. The authority issues a show-cause notice detailing the alleged non-compliance and providing an opportunity for the company or concerned individuals to present their case.

4.    Evidence and Hearings: The entity or individuals involved in the alleged violation have the chance to respond, provide explanations, and present evidence to defend themselves against the accusations. Hearings or meetings may be conducted where both parties can present their arguments and evidence.

5.    Adjudication: Following the presentation of evidence and arguments from both sides, the adjudicating authority examines the case and delivers its judgment. This judgment can involve imposing penalties, fines, or other corrective actions as deemed necessary by the authority. The decision is usually based on the severity of the breach, the impact on stakeholders, and the gravity of the violation.

6.    Appeals: In most cases, there is a provision for appealing the decision of the adjudicating authority to a higher court or tribunal if the concerned party disagrees with the judgment.

7.    Outcome: Depending on the findings, the outcome can involve imposing penalties, fines, directing corrective actions, disqualification of directors, or other measures aimed at rectifying the non-compliance and ensuring future adherence to the law.

Adjudication proceedings serve as an important mechanism to enforce compliance with corporate laws and regulations, promoting transparency, accountability, and good governance in the functioning of companies and their officers.

Top of Form

 

Compounding under Companies Act 2013

 

Compounding under the Companies Act 2013 provides a mechanism for companies and their officers to settle certain offenses or breaches of the law by paying a prescribed penalty without undergoing a lengthy legal trial. Here's a detailed explanation:

1.    Nature of Compounding: Compounding is a process that allows for the settlement of offenses related to non-compliance or violations of specific provisions under the Companies Act 2013. Instead of facing prosecution, the company or its officers can apply for compounding by admitting to the offense and paying a prescribed penalty.

2.    Eligibility for Compounding: Not all offenses are eligible for compounding. The Act specifies offenses that are compoundable, and these typically involve procedural or technical lapses rather than severe breaches that require extensive legal action. Offenses that are of a serious nature, involving fraud or substantial harm to stakeholders, may not be compoundable.

3.    Application Process: The company or its officers must submit an application for compounding to the Registrar of Companies (RoC) or the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), depending on the nature of the offense. The application includes details of the offense, the circumstances, and the proposed terms for settlement.

4.    Consideration and Approval: The concerned authority evaluates the application, considering various factors such as the nature and gravity of the offense, the impact on stakeholders, past record of compliance, etc. If deemed fit, they may approve the compounding application with specific terms and conditions.

5.    Payment of Penalty: Upon approval, the applicant is required to pay the prescribed penalty amount as determined by the authority. This penalty is often a pre-determined sum specified for each offense or a calculated amount based on the severity and impact of the violation.

6.    Effect of Compounding: Once the penalty is paid and the compounding process is completed, the offense is considered settled, and the company or individuals involved will not face further legal proceedings or prosecution for that particular offense.

7.    Non-Compliance with Compounding Terms: If the company or its officers fail to comply with the terms and conditions specified during the compounding process, the authority may revoke the compounding order, leading to the initiation of legal proceedings for the original offense.

Compounding provides an avenue for companies and individuals to rectify certain lapses without undergoing a full trial, promoting a quicker resolution of minor offenses while emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory requirements.

Top of Form

 

Renunciation in Private Placement

 Section 62 deals with the renouncement of rights by a shareholder and how it applies to certain scenarios like a company's right issue or private placement.

Right Issue: When a company decides to issue additional shares to its existing shareholders at a price usually lower than the prevailing market price, it's termed a "right issue." This gives existing shareholders the right (but not the obligation) to buy more shares in proportion to their existing holdings.

Renouncement of Rights: Sometimes, a shareholder might not have the financial capability to subscribe to these additional shares, even though they have the right to do so. In such cases, Section 62 allows a shareholder to renounce their right to buy these shares by selling this right to someone else who is willing to subscribe to these shares. This action of selling the right to subscribe is termed "renouncing the right."

Private Placement: Private placement is a process where a company offers shares or securities to a select group of investors without making a public offering. Section 62 (3) specifies the rules regarding private placement offers. It states that a company conducting private placement must issue an offer and application in a specific format to identified individuals or entities whose details are recorded by the company.

Renunciation in Private Placement: The proviso (the part starting with "Provided that...") clarifies that in the case of private placement, the offer and application documents issued by the company cannot be transferred or renounced to another person. This means that the right to subscribe to shares or securities through private placement cannot be sold or transferred to someone else.

So, while shareholders in a right issue can sell their right to subscribe to additional shares if they can't afford them, shareholders participating in a private placement cannot transfer this right to another person. This is to maintain control over who participates in the private placement and prevent the transfer of these rights to unidentified parties.

Exemption to Consolidation of Accounts for Wholly-Owned and Non-Listed Subsidiaries under Chapter IX of The Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014

 

Introduction:

Under Chapter IX of The Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, there is a provision that allows certain companies to be exempt from the requirement of preparing consolidated financial statements. This exemption is specified in the second proviso of the rule related to the manner of consolidation of accounts. Here, we provide an in-depth explanation of the conditions that a company must meet to be eligible for this exemption:

1) Wholly-Owned or Partially-Owned Subsidiary:

·       To qualify for the exemption, the company in question must either be a wholly-owned subsidiary or a partially-owned subsidiary of another company. In the case of a partially-owned subsidiary, it is crucial that all its members, including those who do not have voting rights, are informed in writing about the decision not to present consolidated financial statements.

·       Proof of delivery of such intimation should be available with the company, demonstrating that all relevant parties have been duly notified.

2) Non-Listing of Securities:

·       The second condition for exemption is that the company's securities must not be listed on any stock exchange, whether in India or outside India. In other words, the company should not be publicly traded.

3) Compliance with Accounting Standards:

·       The third condition specifies that the ultimate or any intermediate holding company of the subsidiary should file consolidated financial statements with the Registrar of Companies. These consolidated financial statements must be in compliance with the applicable Accounting Standards.

Key Takeaways:

·       Chapter IX of The Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 contains provisions related to the consolidation of accounts by companies.

·       The second proviso of the rule grants an exemption from the requirement of preparing consolidated financial statements under certain conditions.

·       To be eligible for the exemption, a company must:

·       Be a wholly-owned or partially-owned subsidiary.

·       Ensure that all its members are informed in writing about the decision not to present consolidated financial statements, with proof of delivery available.

·       Not have securities listed on any stock exchange.

·       Have its ultimate or intermediate holding company file consolidated financial statements in compliance with Accounting Standards.

This exemption is designed to provide flexibility to certain companies, particularly subsidiaries, and to ease their regulatory burden in cases where consolidated financial statements may not be necessary or practical. Companies should carefully assess their eligibility for this exemption and ensure compliance with the specified conditions to avoid any regulatory issues related to the consolidation of accounts.

Company's Register of Charges: Compliance with Chapter VI of The Companies (Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014

 

Introduction:

In accordance with Chapter VI of The Companies (Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014, every company is obligated to maintain a register of charges at its registered office. This register, known as Form No. CHG.7, serves as a critical document for recording and documenting various aspects of charges imposed on the company's property, assets, or undertakings. Below, we provide a detailed explanation of the key provisions and requirements related to the company's register of charges:

1) Maintenance of Form No. CHG.7:

·       Every company, regardless of its size or structure, is required to maintain a register of charges using the prescribed format, Form No. CHG.7.

·       The register should contain comprehensive particulars of all charges that have been registered with the Registrar of Companies. This includes details of charges imposed on the company's property, assets, or undertakings.

2) Inclusion of Charge Details:

·       The company's register of charges must include information on the creation of new charges, any modifications to existing charges, and the satisfaction or discharge of charges.

3) Timely Recording of Entries:

·       The company is obligated to make entries in the register of charges promptly. This means that as soon as a charge is created, modified, or satisfied, the relevant details must be entered into the register without delay.

4) Authentication of Entries:

·       An important requirement is that all entries in the register of charges must be authenticated. Authentication is typically done by one of the following:

·       A director of the company

·       The secretary of the company

·       Any other person authorized by the company's Board for this specific purpose.

·       This authentication process ensures the accuracy and reliability of the information contained in the register.

Key Takeaways:

·       Compliance with Chapter VI of The Companies (Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014 is essential for all companies.

·       Form No. CHG.7 serves as the standardized format for the company's register of charges.

·       The register must contain details about charge creation, modification, and satisfaction.

·       Entries should be made immediately after these events occur.

·       Authentication of entries can be performed by a director, secretary, or an authorized person designated by the Board.

It is imperative for companies to adhere to these rules and maintain an accurate and up-to-date register of charges to ensure transparency and compliance with regulatory requirements. Failure to do so may result in legal consequences and penalties. Therefore, companies must establish robust processes to monitor and update their registers in a timely manner, with due attention to authentication requirements.

Top of Form