Saturday, April 17, 2010

Powers of Managing Directors case analysis

he case reported in October 2008 Chartered SecretaryWhether the managing director had power to initiate suit on behalf of the company without authorization from the Board of Directors.Wasava Tyres V Printers (Mysore) Ltd (2008) 56 SCL 171 (KAR) K.Sreedhar Rao J Decided on20.11.2008Act : Companies Act 1956 - Section 2 (26) Powers of Managing Director - Managing Director of the respondent company filed suit against the appellants- Appleant contended that MD had no proper authorisation to file the suit - Brief Facts: The Managing Director of the respondent company files a suit on behalf of the company against the appellants tenants and the trial court granted decree directing the tenant to vacant and deliver possession of the tenanted premises. Reply by Appellant: A person to file a suit on behalf of the company should have the necessary authorization from the board to institute the suit in order to bind the company and in the instant case, the managing director had no proper authorization from the board of Directors.Judgement: The institution of the suit on behalf of the company by the managing director is deemed to be within substantial powers of the management. Therefor by virtue of provisions of Section 2 (26) the suit instituted by the managing director is deemed to be within his power and authority.
Section 2(26) specifically provides that the powers of management may be entrusted with a managing director by an agreement or a resolution passed at a general or a Board's meeting or by the memorandum or the articles of the company and the powers of management so entrusted with a managing director are to be exercised by him subject to the superintendence, control and direction of the Board of directors. Shareholders of a company have no authority to interfere with the powers of the Board or of a managing director.The Managing Director entrusted the powers by virtue of provisions contained in Section 2 (26) of the Companies Act, 1956. The powers already conferred by him by way of agreement or resolution passed by the Board or the company or by virtue of its memorandum and Articles of Association of the company. Normally the companies prefer to pass a resolution before filing a suit on behalf of the company. In the instant case no resolution was passed and the managing director filed the suit. The court observed that by virtue of substantial powers of managment, the Managing Director is competent to file suit on behalf of the comapny. At the time of appointment of Managing directors, these powers will be conferred to him by a way of resolution by the Board of Directors. It is not necessary to pass another resolution at the time of initating the suit.Substantial powers of managementThe "substantial powers" of management may be conferred upon him by virtue of an agreement with the company, or by a resolution of the company or the Board or by virtue of its memorandum and articlesSection 2 (26) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines the term Managing Directors. The features of the definition are as follows.a) He must be a director of the companyb) Entrusted with substantial powers of management of the company which would not otherwise be exercisable by a directorc) The powers to do administrative acts are not to be deemed to be substantial powers of managementd) Delegation of powers to Managing Director by - i) an agreement or ii) a resolution passed at a general or a board's meeting or iii) by the memorandum or the articles of association of the company.e) The powers so delegated to the Managing director are to be exercised by him subject to the superintendence, control and direction of the Board of directors.f) A person who occupies the position of MD without being designated as such would also be deemed to be a managing director.The Supreme Court has recently dealt with the question of the powers of directors vis-a-vis the managing director (MD) [SMC Pharmaceuticals Ltd v Neeta Bhalla [2005] 127 Comp Cas 563]. The division of powers between shareholders, board and MD has been examined by the courts in several cases.
The powers of an MD derive from one of the source stated in the Companies Act (CA), although the law does recognise 'implied powers'; the principal source of an MD's powers is the board of directors (BoD). This principle carries great weight with respect liability for defaults and contraventions of law by the company, because the liability depends on the powers.
The day to day management is entrusted to the managing director who can exercise powers of management without referring to the Board. It is necessary that the articles must provide for such an appointment being made. Boschoek Proprietary Co. Ltd. v. Fuke, (1906) 1 Ch 148.
In absence of any Regulations in the articles, the Board can confer powers of management on the managing director by virtue of the definition given in s. 2(26) read with s. 291 of the Companies Act 1956 ('the Act'). The Board is competent to do this under s. 291. The general management and conduct of the affairs of the company are vested in the Board of directors. The Board is collectively responsible for the management and conduct of the business of the company. A managing director as such has no specific powers or duties recognised by the Act. He derives the powers from the company or its Board, and s. 2(26) gives sufficient indication as to the sources of powers of a managing director. A managing director has those duties to perform which the Board of directors may from time to time entrust with him. Readers view invited on the above subject.

Admissibility of entries in the books of account

  The Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (Indian Evidence Act 2023) Section 28 deals with the admissibility of entries in the books of accoun...